Council VoteTracker
A searchable, plain-language record of how the Suisun City Council voted across roughly three and a half years of meetings.
- Context
- SuisunInFocus
- Year
- 2026
- Disciplines
- Web, Data, Communications
- Role
- Research and data entry
- 350+Council votes recorded
- 80+Meetings reviewed
- 3.5Years covered (approx.)
The challenge
Council decisions are public, but they live inside long PDF minutes written in procedural language. To find out how a council member voted on housing, policing or the budget, a resident has to know which meeting to open and how to read it.
The information was available. It was not usable.
What I did
I read the minutes from more than 80 meetings and recorded each vote as its own entry: what was decided, in a sentence a resident can follow, how each member voted, and a link back to the official minutes.
I then organized the record by topic so a reader can start from a subject they care about rather than a meeting date.
How it works
Every entry pairs a plain-language summary with the official source. The summary helps people understand; the link lets them check.
- 01One vote, one entry: summary, outcome, member-by-member votes
- 02Topic grouping for browsing; search for specific items
- 03A direct link to the official minutes on every entry
- 04Corrections made in the open when an entry is wrong
- Topic
- e.g. Public safety
- Meeting
- Date of the council meeting
- What was decided
- One plain-language sentence describing the item
- Outcome
- Passed / failed, with the tally
- How each member voted
- Member-by-member: yes, no, abstain, absent
- Source
- Link to the official minutes
The result
The record now covers 350+ votes. SuisunInFocus data was used in a Suisun City Council vote about police funding and was picked up by local news.
Methods, limitations & lessons
Plain-language summaries are interpretations, so the official minutes remain the authority and are always one click away. Coverage spans about 3.5 years; earlier votes are not yet included.
The main lesson: the source link is not a footnote. It is what makes a simplified summary trustworthy.
What I owned
- Research and data entry
- Plain-language writing
- Information architecture
- Site design and build
- Corrections policy